On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:25:29PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >> That change seems like something easily big enough for HEAD, and >> probably it'd be over the threshold that I'd need to be copyright- >> assigned. That's doable, but it'll take time of course. > > Copyright assignment isn't needed for setup.exe.
(Searches archives... where did I get the idea that it was?) Oh, okay, oops. That's fine then. And uncivilised employment contracts aren't an issue in this case. Okay, no more excuses... it's about time I got set up to build setup.exe... > Yes, lets turn it on it's head though: how does a user that *does* want that > enter it via the GUI if we strip the final /? I was thinking of "http://foo.com/foo%2f", but apparently URL-encoding doesn't apply to slashes, and I have to go and reread the relevant RFC. (Probably there's an "of course it doesn't apply to separators!" involved here :-)) Never mind, then. John