On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:17:05PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 12:04:30PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> >It isn't. I tried compiling it, failed miserably, had to revert to >> >gcc-2.95, but couldn't get the right gcc-mingw back... As it is, it only >> >fails at the link stage. Hopefully, extracting libstdc++.a will resolve >> >that. Thanks a bunch! >> >> Why not just install the gcc2 package? It should already have all the >> required bits already. > >With gcc-3.2, gcc2, and gcc-mingw-3.2-20020817 (IIRC) installed, the link >still fails. I've replaced 'gcc' and 'g++' by 'gcc-2' and 'g++-2' >respectively in the suggested configure options... I suppose the build >would have worked with gcc2, as long as the right mingw libstdc++.a was >installed. I'll try that next, if it works for 2.95.
The right libstdc++.a is *supposed* to be installed when you install gcc2. If you've installed the mingw gcc package too, then maybe that's what is mucking things up.