Just a couple of questions, but it has my vote AS IS. Works fine, installs fine, etc.2. chkconfig version: 1.2.24h-1 status : reviewed notes : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00098.html reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00232.html votes : ?! (Joshua and others) url : http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/chkconfig/chkconfig-1.2.24h-1.tar.bz2 http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/chkconfig/chkconfig-1.2.24h-1-src.tar.bz2 http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/chkconfig/setup.hint
So that's two votes...
--Chuck
------------------
conf) Why --disable-nls? Just to avoid the dependency on
libintl? (But you have a dynamic dependency on popt, so..)
Wait. No, *Sergey's* binary does NOT depend on popt. Mine does.
I guess that's just because I had popt installed, so configure
found and used it.
So why not link against popt, Sergey? If you're worried about
dynamic dependencies, you can set LDFLAGS=-static and that will
force gcc to use the static libpopt.a...
------------------
install) Any particular reason that you use
make install prefix=... exec_prefix=...
instead of
make install DESTDIR=... ?
(I understand why xinetd doesn't; it doesn't use automake and
doesn't grok DESTDIR. But chkconfig is and does, so...)
---------------------