On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 10:49, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > I tend to agree with Max here (even though I have a broadband connection). > I'm *really* wary of touching remote repositories. And we could use > mailing list archives for patch history. ;-)
mailing list archives are nowhere near as easy for me to perform partch archaeology on. > Also, I'd rather be aware of > the conflicts between patches as I'm developing them, rather than when the > time comes to apply them to HEAD... Sure. And you could do that via a branch that was up to date with both patch branches. HEAD / \ p1 p2 \ / p3 where p3 shows the merged patch, and p1 and p2 are the isolated changesets. > So thanks for the offer, Rob, but I > don't think I'll be using it anytime soon... > Igor Thats fine. I'm happy as long as I get single-change patches. Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part