On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 20:15, Max Bowsher wrote: > Robert Collins wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-04-06 at 19:40, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > > > > > >> The question is not what I'd like, but what you won't. If RECTWrapper > >> is still acceptable, that's what it'll be. > > > > RECTWrapper is still acceptable. > > Can we go with RECTAdapter? It doesn't wrap, and since Robert said > RECTAdapter was also OK, we might as well use that.
Sure. RECTAdapter is also OK. I don't care which. As a data point: it does wrap though - as it inherits from RECT. > For the record, Robert, I still think RECTPP is the best name. I understand that, but disagree. I thought it was pretty clear in my first review email! Rob -- GPG key available at: <http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
