At 11:32 PM 7/21/2003 -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > >> >> Given that 1.8.3-3 and 1.8.3-4 contain incompatible dlls, isn't the >> tradition to name the packages differently and have them coexist in >> setup for a while (without default upgrading when in non-test mode)? >> >> That way old applications can keep working when gdbm is updated >> and rebuilding the databases is only necessary when the relevant >> application (exim, cvs,...) is updated to use the new gdbm. > >Yes, it is -- and that is what I did. > >The old dll was/is named cyggdbm-3.dll and is in the libgdbm3 package. >The new dll is named cyggdbm-4.dll and is in the libgdbm4 package. > >What's the problem?
None. I didn't know about libgdbm4. Pierre
