> * In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * On the subject of "Re: new package proposal: CLISP" > * Sent on Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:29:45 -0400 (EDT) > * Honorable Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 04:57:37PM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote: > > >I created a new package: CLISP (http://clisp.cons.org) > > > > > >ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/lisp/clisp/binaries/latest/cygwin/clisp-2.31-1.tar.bz2 > > >ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/lisp/clisp/binaries/latest/cygwin/clisp-2.31-1-src.tar.bz2 > > >ftp://ftp2.cons.org/pub/lisp/clisp/binaries/latest/cygwin/setup.hint > > > > The setup.hint looks ok other than the fact that putting the '@ clisp' > > in a setup.hint is redundant. > > Quoting setup.hint: > > requires: cygwin readline X > ^ > There is no package called "X". Is this a typo?
should be XFree86-bin. how do I find out all DLL dependencies? -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k <http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/> <http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com> Despite the raising cost of living, it remains quite popular.
