Christopher Faylor writes: > I think I've set up everything correctly. It looks like most of the > packages just needed to have their curr/test entries removed to do > the right thing.
Thanks very much. > tetex/tetex-beta refers to a curr and prev, neither of which are available, > and, in fact, results in an empty setup.ini setting. Should this package > just be removed? > There is a tetex-beta-20020530-3 package available but > it isn't clear if this is what should be used. Yes, please do. This package is a leftover from the split tetex-beta and texmf times. It is empty and served as an upgrade helper. The equivalent texmf upgrade helpers (texmf, texmf-base, texmf-doc, texmf-extra, texmf-tiny) can be remove too. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org