No 2.6.9-1 didn't include any critical fixes, 2.6.8-3 can be prev.On 2003-12-15T14:59-0500, Mark Blackburn wrote: ) I have updated the lftp package to the new vendor version 2.6.10. Please ) upload at your earliest convenience. ... ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1.tar.bz2 ) http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/lftp-2.6.10-1-src.tar.bz2 ) HINT http://blackburn.homeip.net/cygwin-packages/release/lftp/setup.hint
Uploaded. Should I leave 2.6.9-1 as prev, or should 2.6.8-3 receive that honor since 2.6.9-1 is barely 24 hours old? I might recommend 2.6.8-3 as prev unless 2.6.9-1 included some critical fixes itself.
Daniel Reed wrote:
- Update: lftp 2.6.10 Mark Blackburn
- Re: Update: lftp 2.6.10 Daniel Reed
- Mark Blackburn