Yes I've been dealing with some personal issues which mean I've done ... pretty much nothing lately. No one should feel like they are waiting on me, it'll probably be a little while before I redo my doxygen package. If someone else does it first, that would be great. And while graphviz got the votes, there was never a clear decision on the legal status, and I haven’t yet done the obvious thing and attempted to follow it up with the graphviz people themselves.
FWIW I did manage to get upstream to patch the doxygen textmode bug, I just haven’t done anything since then. Gareth PS: I realise there is a new version of aspell, and a beta of nano to consider - I'll get round to looking at them shortly, I hope! > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 3:15 AM > To: CygWin-Apps > Subject: RE: doxygen 1.3.5 vs 1.2.18 (?) > > Lapo Luchini wrote on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:26 PM: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, > > I'm just curious about work on a "newer" doxygen package: is > > it under way? there are reasons not to? > > Original maintainer has been disappeared long ago. Gareth Pearce once > wanted to take over and sent also an ITP for the related graphviz, but > I've not heard anything from him about these packages for some months, > too. So ... > > > of course "I don't > > have time" and/or "1.3 is not a stable branch" are perfectly good > > reasons ^_^) > > > Regards, > Jörg
