>>>>> "cgf" == Christopher Faylor writes: cgf> I haven't been paying close attention but perhaps this discussion should cgf> be moved to the cygwin mailing list. This topic has been rehashed many cgf> times there. If we haven't reached the point where we can actually *build* cgf> the package then it clearly shouldn't even be a candidate for an ITP.
Well the package builds fine OOTB when having installed all the necessary packages. The problem is only that iconv support isn't properly detected by configure. But I moved this discussion to the main list. cgf> cgf Ciao Volker