-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: | Lapo, I have two patches from you (one dated 20030830[1], the other | 20040122[2]; with some minor differences even after whitespace cleanup) -- | I assume you'd like me to apply the later one? Should I use the | accompanying message for the ChangeLog?
Frankly I don't remember th differences, but when I did the last one I was thinking not of an "upgrade" but as a "full submission" (because the first one was not anwered yet, of course), so I guess the latest one is good.
I don't remember the accomapnying message either 0=) but if you think it fits as a ChangeLog you can use it of course.
Latest one: <http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-01/msg00177.html>
Lapo
- -- L a p o L u c h i n i l a p o @ l a p o . i t w w w . l a p o . i t / http://www.megatokyo.it -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkAqVeQACgkQaJiCLMjyUvvAbACfelZp0O4C3Cm3nzrvwC76o5E9 E1YAoJoN2HAdbkpHqhdpMFpvshssIu+t =vWrp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----