On 2004-02-10T23:36+0100, Stipe Tolj wrote: ) Daniel Reed wrote: ) > Offhand the Cygwin-specific README is misnamed ) > (usr/share/doc/Cygwin/apache-1.3.29-1.README for Apache 1.3.29-2), and the ) > documentation is in the somewhat confusing ) > usr/share/doc/apache-1.3.29-eapi/, but neither of thise are show stoppers. ) ups, correct, missed to rename the README to the new patch revision. ) Should I change that quickly?
I have already uploaded the package, so any changes made now would have to increase the release number. I do not believe this change would be worth having everyone download the entire package again. ) the apache-1.3.29-eapi is because the source is including the EAPI ) (enhanced API) from mod_ssl. This is needed due to the fact that we ) can have mod_ssl as a seperate package. I think this is definetly a ) good naming, since on the other hand people may think that this is the ) "pure" core API, which in fact is not the case. If this is a major difference, you might do better having the package itself be named "apache-eapi", and leaving the documentation scheme unmodified (so your documentation would be in usr/share/doc/apache-eapi-1.3.29-1/). The convention is to use usr/share/doc/PACKAGE-VERSION/ or usr/share/doc/PACKAGE-VERSION-RELEASE/ . -- Daniel Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://naim-users.org/nmlorg/ http://naim.n.ml.org/ A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. -- Douglas Adams, Novelist