On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 12:44:09PM -0600, Marcus G. Daniels wrote: >Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >>The current maintainers are eligible to vote. >> >How does one go about generating interest for packages that the >maintainers would be unlikely to use themselves? E.g. packages >targeted for particular pre-existing scientific communities? Is >advocacy appropriate on this list?
bribes?