On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:06:21PM -0700, Joe Linoff wrote: >I am afraid that I am not sure what you mean by beta-test but I don't >think that the program needs to be tested at all.
Any reason for sending this multiple times? What everyone seems to be missing is this: http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=ccdoc%2Fccdoc-0.8.39-1&grep=ccdoc ccdoc is already part of the distribution. That's what I mean by "beta test". I don't understand why you'd send a "ready for experimentation" message here. Do you see any other messages like that in this mailing list? >This version of ccdoc has been released to sourceforge and is already in >the public domain. > >The reason I submitted it to this group for approval was because I was >bit confused by the cygwin submission documentation and wasn't sure >whether I got the directory structures right in the tar files. Here is >the directory structure for the binary release (ccdoc-08.41-1.tar.bz2): Why are you having problems figuring out how to package this after having already provided it once before: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00270.html I'm thoroughly confused. You are the package maintainer but you, and everyone else are treating this like a new experience. cgf