On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:58:32AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote: > >You might also want to be aware of: > > > >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01101.html > > Does this mean that I should generate a new version of binutils?
Not necessarily, it just means that I can't cut and paste between Windows Mozilla and Cygwin Pine in an rxvt terminal :-(. I meant to say: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01263.html You must be reading my mind, though. For gcc 3.4, I'd say definately yes please. For gcc 3.3.3-3, it's still up in the air. I've yet to see a confirmed issue there. We are using custom built tools (gdb & gcc) to support DWARF 2, so adding a custom binutils as a work around for this issue was trivial. Thanks for asking. Maybe Harold will find a solid example of a problem between gcc-3.3.3 and binutils :shrug:. -- Brian Ford Senior Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained pilot...
