On Fri, 15 Apr 2005, Dave Korn wrote:
> 5) Do I really need to worry about putting return statements after calling
> "LogSingleton::GetInstance().exit (1);" ? There was a reference in there to
> some kind of 'issue' with ::exit, but I haven't yet done an archive search
> to try and understand what's going on - does anyone remember?
IIRC, gcc needs to know that the exit() function never returns. It does
know for ::exit() (because there's an appropriate attribute on it), but it
doesn't for LogSingleton::exit(), and so will complain that the functions
are missing a return statement. So you need to put those in to quell the
warnings.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total
Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT
