On May 3 12:26, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: > FWIW, I fully support your stance that your unilaterally-imposed > "disqualification" was unwarranted. At the same time, it's not difficult to > understand Hans' consternation and reaction to the situation. Doxygen is a > very useful package, and it would be sad for the "Cygwin immune system" to > reject its inclusion on the basis that somebody did too much work.
As usual you're off the point. Anyway, please move over to cygwin-talk. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com Red Hat, Inc.
