On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > If BASEPKG seems better for the upstream package name,
>
> What about just ${UPSTREAM_PACKAGE_NAME}?
You know, the thought did cross my mind. But the above is just unwieldy
enough to remove it from consideration.
OTOH, it would be nice if all of the configuration variables in the GBS
(i.e., those that may be changed by the maintainers) were collected in one
place, with comments like the one Harold suggested (and Max added).
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"The Sun will pass between the Earth and the Moon tonight for a total
Lunar eclipse..." -- WCBS Radio Newsbrief, Oct 27 2004, 12:01 pm EDT
