Op Tue, 21 Jun 2005 04:39:43 +0200 (MET DST) schreef ik in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: : Op Sun, 19 Jun 2005 16:17:13 -0500 schreef Gary R. Van Sickle : in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] :: Suppose instead of the current shortcut hybrid scheme, and also instead of :: copying the executables, and also instead of using NT-only hardlinks (which :: IIUC aren't Unixoid enough to be "drop-ins" anyway), "Somebody" wrote a :: "symlink.exe" executable that worked sort of like this: : : I happen to have a program I call ``wrap''... [...] : It (my ``wrap'') uses files in "/etc/wrap/" + basename(argv[0]). [...] : My current wrap.exe is 4096 bytes, after stripping. : :: - See that it was executed with the name "/bin/ls.exe" :: - Look up "/bin/ls.exe" in the database to find which real executable it :: should run. : : The name of the executable to execute is read from /etc/wrap/ls. [...] : My ``wrap'' uses execvp()... [...] : If there is interest in this, I'll happily ``ITP'' it... : Just let me know.
Well? What's up? Anybody there? Do I need to provide more info? L8r, Buzz. -- ) | | ---/ ---/ Yes, this | This message consists of true | I do not -- | | / / really is | and false bits entirely. | mail for ) | | / / a 72 by 4 +-------------------------------+ any1 but -- \--| /--- /--- .sigfile. | |perl -pe "s.u(z)\1.as." | me. 4^re
