Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I just had a look into the boost packages and from my point of view they are not GTG, for various reasons. - The Cygwin naming convention of DLLs is not used: - The DLLs are not versioned. They are on Linux: - The naming convention for static and dynamic link libs is not used:
Hmmm...I built boost on cygwin a while back, and I seem to remember that the 'gcc' toolset "did the right thing" on cygwin (but I could be wrong). Is it possible that somebody broke the gcc toolset's cygwin support in the recent (last week) Boost-1.33 release?
-- Chuck
