-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Thank you very much! Let's wait until end of the week, if Mark doesn't > show up, feel free to create a new package.
Then... should I? (I didn't notice any message from Mark, but then again I've been very busy and the ML has been quite high traffic, so I may have missed it) What about the fact that that advisory referred to a fact that is probably so by design (but which I can *NOT* reproduce with actual Cygwin version, which was updated just a few days AFTER the date of that advisory message)? If that is felt as a strong problem, we should probably evaluate using FreeBSD's whois? Seems to be a bit less easy to use with some addresses, and has way more options <http://tinyurl.com/7zvka>. Either way suits me ;-) Lapo - -- L a p o L u c h i n i l a p o @ l a p o . i t w w w . l a p o . i t / -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Cygwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkMxkugACgkQaJiCLMjyUvvSTACg8J++CA3zmK3PQeJ0mprTNPDJ cksAn3+T76uAeKx6I4+6cNCOWdxcpG9x =R9ZO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----