Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:20:35PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
libpopt0 Christopher Faylor
popt Christopher Faylor
Actually, that's my package
I just took these because I thought they were related to rpm and I'm
taking on rpm. So, sorry for the confusion.
Actually, Chris, Nicholas, this is the EXACT reasoning behind Nick's
original adoption of popt from me:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-06/msg00069.html
It "went with" rpm, which Nick was ITP'ing, so it made sense for him to
take over popt maintainership.
I think it still makes sense -- so if cgf has taken over rpm, IMO popt
maintainership should also go with it. But obviously, it's up to you guys.
--
Chuck
