On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:09:38PM -0600, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> No problems with the packaging (except that the ldesc lines in setup.hint >> are too long, IMHO. However, I don't see that gnubg is packed with any >> Linux distro according to rpmfind, so we need the usual three votes here. > >FWIW, > >Debian: >http://packages.debian.org/stable/games/gnubg > >Gentoo: >http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=games-board;name=gnubg
Btw, as long as we're talking about this, I think we need to clarify the rules a little. I don't think that existence of a package in an experimental category in Debian or any other distribution should make it an automatic candidate for inclusion in Cygwin. I might even go so far as to say that Debian unstable doesn't qualify but I could be dissuaded from that view. This doesn't pertain to this thread that I've hijacked but I keep meaning to make this point. Seeing the URLs above reminded me to do so. cgf