James R. Phillips wrote:
--- Igor Peshansky wrote:Unless the set of X libraries is *really* small, it would make sense to have a non-X version of ghostscript.OK, we'll have to wait and see on that. Otherwise, I guess we have consensus in principle on a method to carry both versions forward.
I'm currently estimating 6 runtime libraries and 1 data package, to satisfy gs's dependency on libX11 and libXt. I doubt more than that will be necessary for basic usage, but we'll have to see.
Yaakov
