Yaakov wrote: > I know that tcp_wrappers doesn't officially come with > a shared library, but other distributions also do > such patches, but they version their shared lib as > libwrap0
Yes, I have been looking at Debian. I will attempt to create libwrap0.dll.a, libwrap0.a. cygwrap-1.dll is still correct, or cygwrap-0.dll? Charles wrote: > until your dll-ized version of tcp_wrappers goes > curr:, I think you should skip the 'requires: > libwrap1' part. test: users will have to install > libwrap1 manually. Definitely. For testing, it will be manual. Thank you for the helpful information! Another help would be an example of how to see that things are working. Am I correct to expect I could compile, for example, Apache from source and OpenSSH from source to get them both using the shared wrapper library, then see in Sysinternals Process Explorer that one is loaded, shared between? lsof would show this also, perhaps? Anything smaller than Apache to suggest? I suppose testing with Apache is a Good Idea, as it is often used under Cygwin? Best regards, Bryan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com