On Jun 6 11:00, Christopher Faylor wrote: > The discussion in the cygwin list got me wondering if we had had creepage > into the Base category so, since grep is my friend, I came up with this > list: > > alternatives/setup.hint gzip/setup.hint > ash/setup.hint login/setup.hint > base-files/setup.hint man/setup.hint > base-passwd/setup.hint ncurses/libncurses5/setup.hint > bash/setup.hint ncurses/libncurses6/setup.hint > brltty/setup.hint ncurses/libncurses7/setup.hint > coreutils/setup.hint ncurses/libncurses8/setup.hint > cygwin-doc/setup.hint ncurses/setup.hint > cygwin/setup.hint readline/libreadline4/setup.hint > diffutils/setup.hint readline/libreadline5/setup.hint > editrights/setup.hint readline/libreadline6/setup.hint > findutils/setup.hint rebase/setup.hint > gawk/setup.hint run/setup.hint > gdbm/libgdbm-devel/setup.hint sed/setup.hint > gdbm/libgdbm/setup.hint tar/setup.hint > gdbm/libgdbm3/setup.hint termcap/setup.hint > gdbm/libgdbm4/setup.hint terminfo/setup.hint > gdbm/setup.hint which/setup.hint > grep/setup.hint zlib/setup.hint > > > (I obviously could have gotten this from setup.ini, too) > > So the question is: Does this list look right. I'm not sure about > brltty and gdbm. And I also wonder about ncurses, readline, and zlib. > While they probably do get used by default anyway, I wonder why they > have to be in Base. Is there a broken dependency somewhere? If not, it > seems like they would be loaded automatically by anything in Base which > needed them.
I agree for gdbm and everything else which is basically a library (ncurses, readline, zlib). I don't care exactly for brltty, we can also put it into Utils. The two problems I mentioned on the list should be solved anyway. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat