Dave Korn wrote: > We already have a "-p host:port" proxy argument since a little while back. > Think I may have only applied it to mainline rather than branch. Will > combine the best bits from all these patches.
I'd like to quash this idea that things should go on branches. Everything goes to HEAD. The only reason we're talking about a branch is because it was decided that we wanted to make an out-of-cycle release of the recent signature verifying stuff. But that's a special exception, and I don't want to make any others. There is no "1.7 branch". When completed the work for 1.7 will be enabled via #defines, and there will remain only one codebase. Brian