On Aug 21 17:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 21 11:12, Charles Wilson wrote: > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > To rephrase: I think it is a bad idea to remove dependencies from > > > _update-info-dir since so many things rely on it. > > > > Unless: > > > > 1) all of _update-info-dir's dependencies are already satisfied by the > > Base category > > [...] > > In order of least effort to most, I'd vote #1... > > Full ACK.
There's also the fact that neither bash nor texinfo have postinstall scripts themselves. So the dependency from _update-info-dir to bash and texinfo is fully resolved by having bash and texinfo in the Base category. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat