On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51:
>>>On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>Btw, does this version remove the -mno-cygwin option?  If so, I may
>>>have to leave work early so that I can have a celebratory beverage.
>>
>>Sorry :( no beer for you today.  It's a fairly straight build of
>>released 4.3.0 with just a bit of patching for shared libgcc etc.
>>
>>Anyway, I'll be doing the upload later tonight after I get home from
>>work.  I thought it unlikely that the category settings would be
>>persisted, but don't want to get caught out by making a dumb
>>assumption....  if at all possible ...
>
>I thought the next version of gcc was not going to perpetuate the
>-mno-cygwin madness.  I'd really prefer not releasing a version with
>this option even if it is just commented out.

Btw, Dave, do you want me to sponsor you as one of the new
cygwin-on-windows maintainers?  I was suggesting Kai Tietz as another
alternative for MinGW.  It would be nice to have an active Cygwin
maintainer as well.

cgf

Reply via email to