On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:35:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:01:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote on 09 September 2008 18:51: >>>On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >>>Btw, does this version remove the -mno-cygwin option? If so, I may >>>have to leave work early so that I can have a celebratory beverage. >> >>Sorry :( no beer for you today. It's a fairly straight build of >>released 4.3.0 with just a bit of patching for shared libgcc etc. >> >>Anyway, I'll be doing the upload later tonight after I get home from >>work. I thought it unlikely that the category settings would be >>persisted, but don't want to get caught out by making a dumb >>assumption.... if at all possible ... > >I thought the next version of gcc was not going to perpetuate the >-mno-cygwin madness. I'd really prefer not releasing a version with >this option even if it is just commented out.
Btw, Dave, do you want me to sponsor you as one of the new cygwin-on-windows maintainers? I was suggesting Kai Tietz as another alternative for MinGW. It would be nice to have an active Cygwin maintainer as well. cgf