On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:09:35PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote: > On 2/7/2009 11:22 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:58:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> We have two libtool directories with two setup.hints in >>> ~release/_obsolete and ~release. This is causing problems. It seems >>> like things have been like this since at least November and no one was >>> complaining because upset threw out the _obsolete package in favor of a >>> newer one thanks purely to the fragile sort order directory inspection. >>> That has changed now thanks to last week's problems. >>> >>> People are complaining about getting out-of-date versions of libtool. >>> Maybe I'll figure out the intent two seconds after sending this message >>> but I can't see any reason to have two packages with identical names in >>> the release so I have deleted the _obsolete/libtool packages. >>> >>> Looks like even error-checking for upset is in order. >> Two more culprits. >> I don't understand why these duplicate named directories and setup.hints >> were created. Package names are supposed to be unique so it was >> basically luck (and an upset bug) that the _obsolete directories were >> quietly overridden before. >> I've removed _obsolete/apr1 and _obsolete/aprutil1. > > apr1 and aprutil1 packages are supposed to be in the _obsolete category. > The other packages should be in libapr1 and libaprutil1.
They were but they were spread out in two different locations in the ftp area. cgf