--- Lun 23/3/09, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > Da: Corinna Vinschen > Oggetto: Re: [ITA][1.7] lapack-3.1.1-2 > A: > Data: Lunedì 23 marzo 2009, 11:28 > > -----Segue allegato----- > > On Mar 20 16:16, Marco Atzeri > wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > I would like to adopt lapack. > > > > As the current lapack-3.0-8 include both the > > libraries and the development, I propose the > following: > > > > lapack-3.0-9 obsolete and empty that > requires > > liblapack > > [...] > > wget -r- np http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/lapack/ > > > > ./lapack-3.0-9-src.tar.bz2 > > ./lapack-3.0-9.tar.bz2 > > ./lapack-3.1.1-2-src.tar.bz2 > > ./liblapack/liblapack-3.0-9.tar.bz2 > > ./liblapack/setup.hint > > > ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2 > > ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel/setup.hint > > ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel-3.0-9.tar.bz2 > > ./liblapack-devel/liblapack-devel-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2 > > ./liblapack-devel/setup.hint > > ./liblapack_0/liblapack_0/liblapack_0-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2 > > ./liblapack_0/liblapack_0/setup.hint > > ./liblapack_0/liblapack_0-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2 > > ./liblapack_0/setup.hint > > ./setup.hint > > Your obsoletion of lapack itself isn't correct. You > still need the > lapack package yourself for the source archive. I > would create an > empty lapack-3.1.1-2.tar.bz2 as well and keep the category > intact. > > There's also the problem that users of lapack won't get the > new > lapack packages when updating. You should add > liblapack_0 to the > lapack requirements, too. > > > Corinna >
Ok Corinna, I will re-shuffle the setup.hint. I will also rename liblapack_0 to liblapack0 as this should be the right form Regards Marco