On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:31:23PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote: >Dave Korn wrote: >> So here's an updated and retested version of the patch done under the >> assumption that reverting that change will be acceptable; if not, I can find >> a >> different way of doing it. Ok for head? > > Doh, no, obviously not, I left a bunch of debugging in. Hang on ten >minutes, I'll resend.
Huh. I guess I thought those were intentional. Still approved. cgf
