Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 6 15:35, Charles Wilson wrote: >> Charles Wilson wrote: >>> http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-1.0.5-1-src.tar.bz2 >>> http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-1.0.5-1.tar.bz2 >>> http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-devel/libassuan-devel-1.0.5-1.tar.bz2 >>> http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/libassuan-devel/setup.hint >>> http://cygutils.fruitbat.org/ITP-gnupg2/release/libassuan/setup.hint
> Packaging looks ok, but is it really necessary to have a libassuan package > which only > provides the documentation which you then need if you install > libassuan-devel? I think > it would be simpler to haave only a libassuan-devel package. Having foo-VER-src.tar.bz2 foo-devel-VER.tar.bz2 without also having foo-VER.tar.bz2 always seems to cause problems for me, and shipping foo-devel-VER.tar.bz2 foo-devel-VER-src.tar.bz2 just seems like cheating somehow. > Otherwise I'm wondering > if the requirements aren't upside down. You require libassuan (the docs) if > you install > libassuan-devel, but not vice versa... I've removed the interdependent requires: entirely. > Anyway, it's ok to upload as you prefer. Done, and updated cygwin-pkg-maint. Announcement tomorrow. -- Chuck