On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 06:06:05PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >On 23 June 2010 21:44, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 09:35:34PM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>>On 23 June 2010 15:45, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >>>> Same issue as python-gdata; use this instead: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>Thank you again for the cygport hint. ?I've uploaded a new release >>>based on the revised cygport: >>> >>>--- >>> >>>wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \ >>>http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/googlecl/googlecl-0.9.7-1.tar.bz2 \ >>>http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/googlecl/googlecl-0.9.7-1-src.tar.bz2 \ >>>http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/googlecl/setup.hint >>> >>>--- >>> >>>>> It looks like googlecl hasn't made it into any major Linux distro yet, >>>>> so I guess it's going to need to be voted on. >>>> >>>> FWIW it was just added this week to Fedora: >>>> >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/googlecl >>> >>>Excellent! ?I assume then that this package does not need to be voted on? >> >> Not if it's actually in Fedora, no. > >It looks like it's been approved by the Fedora project, but not yet >part of the official distro: > >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/googlecl?_csrf_token=879babc67802f2680669bc5e84da7be1c5bf2632 > >So is this package good to go, or does it need to be voted on?
If it is not officially in a distribution then it needs to be voted on. +1 cgf