--- Lun 15/11/10, Reini Urban ha scritto: > 2010/11/15 Reini Urban : > > 2010/11/15 Marco Atzeri: > >> --- Lun 15/11/10, Andy Koppe ha scritto: > >>> Sorry, one more issue: I think slsh should go > into the > >>> 'Interpreters' > >>> category rather 'Libs', alongside the other > scripting > >>> languages. > >>> > >>> Otherwise, GTG. Thanks very much for packaging > this. > >> > >> right. amended and uploaded again. > > > > I also had a look just now. > > > > Just a hint for the next update. > > Normally with such libraries the docs are put into the > base package. > > You have it in the libslang-devel package.
As the documentation is only useful for the development, I think it is better in this way, and I see that also other packages are built in the same way. A base package with only documentation seems wrong to me. > > Another minor pick, not that important. > > /etc/slsh.rc: > % Add local additions here > It tries to load local-packages from > /usr/share/slsh/local-packages > but this dir does not exist. > Can you add an empty file here, so that it will be > created? cygport is too smart in this case Removing empty directory: /usr/share/slsh/local-packages I will take note for the next repackage > -- > Reini Urban Marco