On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >Please, don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU > > >On Jan 11 22:30, jdzstz - gmail dot com wrote: >> About varnish cache application, the packages are GTG for David. >> >> Please somebody upload the three packages (Prev, Curr and Test) to >> cygwin servers. The package URL that I send in my previous email >> were: >> >> wget >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.2-5-src.tar.bz2 >> wget >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.2-5.tar.bz2 >> wget >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.4-5-src.tar.bz2 >> wget >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-2.1.4-5.tar.bz2 >> wget >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-r5665-5-src.tar.bz2 >> wget >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/varnish-r5665-5.tar.bz2 >> wget >> http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cygvarnish/cygwin-varnish%20package/setup.hint > >Uploaded, but only the curr and test versions. I didn't upload >2.1.2-5 and I removed the "Prev" entry from the setup.hint file. >I don't think there's any sense to upload a version which is >already obsolete and which, due to it's state as old version, >is probably never installed by any user.
Why would we release a "test" version in the very first offering of a new package? That doesn't make any sense to me. cgf