On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:31:08PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >On 2012-05-10 20:30, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I see that there's an OCaml category in setup now. Did I miss a >> discussion which introduced an OCaml category? > >That would be my fault. ocaml-llvm (a subpackage of llvm) was a >carry-over from Ports, where I do use that category to cover nearly 100 >OCaml-related packages. Would you like me to change this, and to what?
Maybe OCaml makes sense. I was just surprised to see it, especially since there only seemed to be one thing in it. Does it fit in any existing category? cgf
