On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Reini Urban writes: >> What's the problem? Lack of upates for these? > > My problem is that I need quite a bunch of additional Perl > distributions, I need to package them into Cygwin packages since they > will need to be installed with setup.exe and the way things are bundled > in perl_vendor makes dependency tracking more difficult.
Which one? I have no idea. When you start proposing your stuff I can remove these packages from perl_vendor. But I still don't get the point. Now you have one dependency: perl_vendor. With your scheme you have many dependencies. > I already have a solution, I simply don't use perl_vendor and re-package > everything I > need from it (essentially all of it, so the selection is quite sound). > That's what I linked to, I wasn't proposing that everything in this > bundle should go into Cygwin. > > I won't bring this up again, I think everybody has said what they wanted > to say. You need to bring this up when you ITP them. Because clashes are disallowed. You cannot provide the same files with different packages. -- Reini Urban http://cpanel.net/ http://www.perl-compiler.org/