On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 11:09 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 10 10:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Oct 9 22:48, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > > > Perhaps a solution is for cygwin/in.h to #define s_addr s_addr to > > > trigger inaddr.h's include guard? > > > > Will do. But that only helps in your case after we updated to the next > > Cygwin version. I guess you already added such a #define to the bind > > code? > > Can you check if my patch to cygwin/in.h works for you?
WFM. > Other than that, was there any other roadblock on the way to the Mingw64 > headers? I think there's still one issue wrt xorg-server; I need to check that again. Yaakov