On 10/17/2012 16:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Oct 16 20:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> On Sat, 2012-10-13 at 13:36 +0800, JonY wrote: >>> I decided do a simpler split out version due to the way the source package >>> is built, with w32api as a meta package. >>> If required I can redo it into a single package. >>> >>> Preference? Comments? >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/setup.hint >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1-src.tar.bz2 >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-libs/w32api-libs-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 >> >> I think the sdesc: is confusing. How about: >> >> sdesc: "Windows API headers" >> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/setup.hint >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1-src.tar.bz2 >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Cygwin%20Snapshots/dist/w32api-includes/w32api-includes-3.0b_svn5431-1.tar.bz2 >> >> sdesc: "Windows API import libraries" >> >> But wouldn't w32api-headers be a better name? > > You have a point there, Yaakov. > > In fact, you already set a precedent with your mingw packages, Jon. We > have mingw64-headers and mingw64-runtime packages. I'm not *that* sure > about the runtime name, but a consistent naming sounds like a good idea. >
Alright, will rename it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature