On Feb 27 20:05, JonY wrote: > On 2/25/2013 22:40, JonY wrote: > > On 2/24/2013 12:55, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 10:01:56AM +0800, JonY wrote: > >>> On 2/24/2013 09:39, Ken Brown wrote: > >>> > >>>> But isn't all this irrelevant for you? There's no reason to keep gcc3 > >>>> around anymore, is there? > >>> > >>> I don't know, I'll leave that to the core Cygwin devs to decide. > >> > >> I'd be happy to get rid of it but don't people still use it? We can't > >> have the gcc4 package overwriting someone's gcc3 if so. > >> > > > > OK. > > > > Anyway, packaging is taking longer than expected, still working on > > packaging bugs. > > > > I'm thinking of releasing a test version without Java, not all the > > patches have been integrated yet. > > > > I now have gcc4-4.7.2-1 built with all the patches integrated but Java > doesn't build, it is a separate issue. I'm hesitant to push it directly > to the download servers, might break things. > > I've put the following in the hits file: > curr: 4.5.3-3 > prev: 4.3.4-4 > test: 4.7.2-1 > > Any staging areas or advice?
Just upload the test release to the release area and write a TEST mail to cygwin-announce. Or is there anything special you'd like to do? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
