Hi Volker, On Apr 4 13:26, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: > >>>>> Peter Rosin writes: > > > Hi! > > aalib is a prerequisite for the GGI packages, but the aalib maintainer > > (hello Dr. Volker Zell) hasn't responded to my query [1] and neither > > to the query by cgf [2], so here I am with a non-maintainer RFU... > > Hi > > I have been on vacation. I have an aalib-1.4rc5-11 (32bit) package ready > for upload with your patch and additionally enabled the slang driver now > that libslang is in the distro. But what is the consense about versioning > between 64 and 32 bit versions of the same package. If I upload my -11 > version it would differ in functionality from the 64 bit version.
it doesn't matter right now. The 64 bit test release is small, compared to the 32 bit distro, and it doesn't contain all required libs yet. For instance, I built the 64 bit OpenSSH version without tcp_wrappers and without Kerberos support, simply because we're missing the libs. So, if your 32 bit distro version is better or contains more functionality than the 64 bit version, so be it. At one point the 64 bit release will catch up. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
