On May 23 11:01, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:44:35AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Right? Wrong? Neither right nor wrong? > > Some of this is has got to be "the user has to know what they're doing". > > They obviously just *can't* install two different telnet or smtp servers, > any more than they could have both a windows telnet server and a cygwin > one. They would have to choose.
Right. > For services, isn't there some other field besides just the name which > can be used as a delineator? No. Every service needs a unique service name, otherwise you couldn't manipulate services unambiguously. > For shortcuts, I don't see anything wrong with adding a "Cygwin 64" to > the name. Right now we have "Cygwin" and "Cygwin-X" folders in the start menu. Maybe we should just change the subdir names to "Cygwin 64" and "Cygwin-X 64", and otherwise stick to the shortcut names. I think only setup creates a desktop shortcut. Setup64 creates the "Cygwin64 Terminal", so if we keep it this way we're off the hook, I guess. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
