On Jun 18 21:51, JonY wrote: > On 6/18/2013 19:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > Whom are you asking? Not me, I hope. If so, whatever you guys think is > > right, is right, as long as gcc just works and the Cygwin DLL builds. > > As a sidepoint, you won't get as much testing as you like as long as the > > stuff is in "test". Most people don't install test versions anyway. > > > > If 4.7.3 is to be considered stable, I need all the cooperation from all > the gcc deps maintainers, clearly gcc-4.7.2 experimental is stable > enough since I am able to build 4.7.3 with it. > > All the new ppl/mpc/mpfr/gmp that were marked experimental needs to be > switched to stable at the same time gcc-4.7.x or else gcc would be > broken for awhile without those DLLs.
This can be arranged, no worries. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat