On 13 January 2014 23:58, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > On 13 January 2014 21:32, Eric Blake wrote: >> That said, while I don't have as much time for cygwin packaging, I >> still DO plan on using git on cygwin, so I at least want to make sure >> my use cases still work when upgrading to the build you just provided >> before we actually upload it. >> >> It may still be a few days before I can test that your new packaging >> works for me (I'd welcome a review from anyone else as well), but the >> overall idea of adopting the package from me seems reasonable. > > There's already a known, fairly major problem with my build, reported by > Steven Penny[0]. I'm hoping to get a fix to that out tomorrow evening. > > [0]: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-01/msg00086.html
There's a new build available at http://tastycake.net/~adam/cygwin/ which resolves that issue. If you want to give it a try and let me know how you get on, I'd be exceedingly grateful.
