On Fri, 2014-08-15 at 23:00 +0100, David Stacey wrote: > On 15/08/14 22:15, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > Where did we leave off wrt breaking out > > perl_vendor? > > Back in April, Reini expressed a desire to keep perl_vendor, claiming > that it is the easiest solution for both user and maintainer [1]. > > Whilst there are some of us who might question this, Reini has vastly > more knowledge and experience of perl than I ever will have. So when > Reini states that there are good reasons why perl_vendor should stay, I > am prepared to respect his judgement. > > As our perl maintainer wishes to keep perl_vendor, any discussion to the > contrary seems somewhat academic.
The problem is that is seems to have remained academic; four months later, and we still don't have a replacement for perl_vendor. Reini, where are you holding with this? It's fine if you don't want to maintain all the perl module packages separately, there are those who are willing to help. Yaakov