Question about clisp version naming

[Ken Brown]

I've succeeded in making dynamic loading of modules work in clisp on 
Cygwin, and I'll be issuing a new release soon.

My work was based on the tip of the upstream Mercurial repository, which 
shows a version number of 2.49+ and is at revision 15623.  So I was 
thinking of using 2.49+hg15623 as the version number.  Will upset be 
happy with that?  Or is there some other standard way of assigning 
version numbers in cases like this?

Ken