On Jun 1 21:49, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > >> Since it seems you plan to use libcrypto from OpenSSL anyway: > >> https://gist.github.com/barrysteyn/7308212#file-base64decode-c > > > > I don't. Why do you think so? > > Because of the openssl branch in Git.
Oh, that was a bad idea. I won't remove the branch for historical reasons, but we don't really want to link agaionst OpenSSL when we already link against gcrypt. > > This was a drop-in replacement for Digest::MD5. Anything else I'll > > let somebody do who better knows perl. > > THen the call $ctx->hexdigest() would need to be replaced by > $ctx->b64digest(). No, it would need to support this additionally. > > Apart from this, the sah512.sum files are not only generated for the > > Cygwin release dir, they are generated on the sourceware ftp area > > system-wide. > > I'm only talking about SHA512 in the setup.ini files, though. The > sha512.sum files have no bearing on that. So what exactly is the problem with the longer checksums? I don't see any problem here, especially when the file is being compressed anyway. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpCDaeaE_EqA.pgp
Description: PGP signature