On Jul 17 10:39, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 7/17/2015 9:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >On Jul 15 16:12, Ken Brown wrote: > >>On 7/15/2015 2:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>On Jul 15 16:24, Marco Atzeri wrote: > > >>> > >>>Thanks for looking into this. > >>> > >>>Two points: > >>> > >>>- Shall we remove all 32b-bit only orphaned packages for which we don't > >>> get a maintainer until, say, end of August? > >> > >>That seems reasonable, as long as there are exceptions for packages where > >>the lack of a 64-bit package is due to genuine porting difficulties. > >>libsigsegv was in that category until yesterday. Another one I'm aware of > >>is ffcall. > > > >I understand, but they are unmaintained. So, who's going to check > >if they are buildable as 64 bit packages? > > I will look on them, just to complete the effort ;-) > > But IMHO some should be killed anyway > > aewm++ ccdoc cramfs mtd ioperm xgraph xsri xview rxvt
Sounds like a plan. These and all mingw packages. > as they are well dead upstream, and eventually also > > nfrotz scsh wtf logiweb > > for the same reason. As for logiweb, I have still hopes. Yaakov uploaded Klaus' SSH key on 2015-01-27. Unfortunately Klaus never followed up after that, but I just pinged him (and CCed him now). > These have surely porting issue > > ffcall flexdll xwinwm > > like xemacs and pdftk so they belong to a different category Ok. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgp2qMB7M8WP5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
